首页> 外文OA文献 >Jet Stream Analysis and Forecast Errors Using GADS Aircraft Observations in the DAO, ECMWF, and NCEP Models
【2h】

Jet Stream Analysis and Forecast Errors Using GADS Aircraft Observations in the DAO, ECMWF, and NCEP Models

机译:在DAO,ECMWF和NCEP模型中使用GADS飞机观测数据进行射流分析和预测误差

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We have utilized an extensive set of independent British Airways flight data recording wind vector and temperature observations (the Global Aircraft Data Set [GADS] archive) in three ways: (a) as an independent check of operational analyses; (b) as an analysis observing system experiment (OSE) as if the GADS observations were available in real time; and (c) as the corresponding forecast simulation experiment applicable to future operational forecasts. Using a 31 day sample (0000 UTC 20 December 2000 through 0000 UTC 20 January 2000) from Winter 2000, we conclude that over the data-dense continental U. S. analyzed jet streaks are too weak by -2% to -5%. Over nearby data-sparse regions of Canada, analyzed jet streaks are too weak by -5% to -9%. The second range provides a limit on the accuracy of current jet streak analyses over the portions of the -85% of the earth's surface that are poorly covered by non-satellite observations. The -5% to -9% range is relevant for the pre-third generation satellite (AIRS, IASI, GIFTS) era.
机译:我们以三种方式利用了一套广泛的独立的英国航空公司飞行数据记录风矢量和温度观测值(全球飞机数据集[GADS]存档):(a)作为对运行分析的独立检查; (b)作为分析观测系统实验(OSE),好像GADS观测是实时可用的; (c)作为适用于未来运营预测的相应预测模拟实验。使用2000年冬季开始的31天样本(2000年12月20日0000 UTC到2000年1月20日UTC),我们得出结论,在美国数据密集的大陆分析的喷气条纹太弱了-2%至-5%。在加拿大附近的数据稀疏地区,分析的喷气条纹太弱了-5%至-9%。第二个范围限制了当前地表射流条纹分析在非卫星观测覆盖不佳的地球表面-85%部分上的准确性。 -5%至-9%的范围与第三代之前的卫星(AIRS,IASI,GIFTS)时代有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号